W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2001

Re: RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft - Internal Draft V1.16

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 19:24:30 +0100
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
CC: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Message-ID: <24145.998591070@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
>>>Jeremy Carroll said:
> Some style issues:
> 
> - I think all references to the WG should be deleted, except as a
> non-normative appendix which may be a list of names of those who have
> contributed.
>
>  (e.g. delete 1st para of section 3, and the TODO item)
> 

I was actioned to make a new version intended to be a group working
draft; and this is part of the way to that.  There are enough
disclaimers to note the status.  The previous version was the private
document with no W3C-style.

At some point the W3C style and WG references have to be added; this
is that point.

I also think it is important to link to the issues that caused the
changes, and I still intend to record that.

> - I think the original grammar should be a link not a quotation.
> 
> - I think section 3 should be a non-normative appendix, leaving the XML
> Infoset approach as normative. (Obviously at the moment everything is
> non-normative!)

There is no need to make the latter changes at this stage since it is not
even an RDF Core WG working draft and even if it was, would not be
normative.  This is a suggested analysis, which I will be adding to.

> A typo:
> 
> In the table in section 3
> " rdf:parseType="Literal\"" should read
> " rdf:parseType=\"Literal\""

Fixed, also for the Resource case.

Dave
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2001 14:24:31 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:48 EDT