Jos wrote: > and then there is a match found with > {_:x <b> <c>} log:forSome _:x. > (i have to think about that, and try...) Jeremy wrote: > > I didn't quite see how the interpolation lemma worked when the LHS has > > anonymous nodes. I was more meaning within the model theory document, rather than within an abstraction from it. The heart of my question was that there appeared to be an implicit renaming going on that, IMHO, needed to be made explicit. Your fix to your logical representation seems to do that. I am not sure what the corresponding fix to the document should be, or even if there needs to be one. JeremyReceived on Wednesday, 22 August 2001 14:15:37 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:47 EDT