W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: The RELAX NG schema for XML-Signature

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 08:25:25 -0400
To: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, site-policy@w3.org
Message-Id: <200804020825.25589.reagle@mit.edu>

Hello, I'm no longer at the W3C and these questions are probably best taken 
on by the "XML Security Specifications Maintenance Working Group" [1] 
and "site-policy" regarding copyright issues, but I provide some thoughts 


On Tuesday 01 April 2008, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote:
> The WXS version of the OOXML schema relies on 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd, 
> which is official.  The OOXML specification does not include 
> this schema, but merely references to it.  I believe that W3C 
> has no problems about that.

I agree.

> The RNG version of the OOXML schema is different.  Since 
> your schema uses the XML syntax and the OOXML schema 
> uses the compact syntax, the OOXML schema in RELAX NG 
> cannot reference to your schema.  I thus translated
> your schema to the compact syntax using trang and 
> the result is attached.

I don't see the attachment.

> Now, we have a problem.  Can ISO/IEC and Ecma publish the 
> attached schema as part of the OOXML specification?  I am 
> not sure if this is acceptable to W3C.  Or, is it possible 
> for W3C to publish the attached schema?  If this is possible, 
> the OOXML specification can merely references to what 
> W3C publishes.

I wrote the RNG as a personal exercise but in any case I think it would be 
covered by the software license [2], just like the XML Schema version, 
which does permit derivative works under certain conditions.

Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 12:26:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:41 UTC