W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2004

XAdES - More secure than XML Dsig?

From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:36:53 +0100
Message-ID: <00f401c406a4$c0d2cc20$0500a8c0@arport>
To: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>


According to some users of XAdES, it is more secure
as you also sign the hash of the signer's certificate in
order to thwart changing this element.

Any thoughts on why this presumably good solution
is not a part of XML Dsig?

thanx
Anders Rundgren

Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 08:44:01 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Rich Salz: "Re: XAdES - More secure than XML Dsig?"
Previous message: Muriel Souville: "Launch of the Security Plugtests Registration"
Next in thread: Rich Salz: "Re: XAdES - More secure than XML Dsig?"
Reply: Rich Salz: "Re: XAdES - More secure than XML Dsig?"
Maybe reply: John Boyer: "RE: XAdES - More secure than XML Dsig?"
Maybe reply: John Boyer: "RE: XAdES - More secure than XML Dsig?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:18 GMT