W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: Signing external data without URL

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:34:12 -0500
Message-ID: <40056174.2040001@datapower.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org

> To put a single Reference pointing to a Manifest
> containing a single Reference seems like a possibility
> but an ugly one.

If you do this, than at least the verifier has *something* they can do. 
  The semantics of Manifest seems to fit exactly into your situation: 
you might not be able to verify the original hash, but everything else 
is legit.

> To NOT specify an URL in a Reference (turning of de-referencing)
> and maybe add a static "Type" attribute seems possible but is that
> recommendable (fully compliant)?

This isn't quite the same.  If you omit the URI attribute, than you are 
saying (according to the 4th paragraph of sec 4.3.3.1) that the verifier 
knows what the reference is, and that they will fetch it on their own. 
This isn't quite the same as Manifest.

I'd go with the Manifest.
	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2004 10:28:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:18 GMT