Re: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML

Hi John,

Thanks for the corrections. I applied them. BTW, E05 in c14n was
intended to b e E02. I fixed that too.

On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:19:23AM -0800, John Boyer wrote:
> 
> E04 in excl-c14n has a double 'the'.
> 
> E05 in c14n: adverbs are often bad, double adverbs are worse.  Best to remove 'easily and' since 'incorrectly' is sufficient to justify the erratum.

-jose

Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2003 05:21:08 UTC