RE: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML

Hi Jose,

E04 in excl-c14n has a double 'the'.

E05 in c14n: adverbs are often bad, double adverbs are worse.  Best to remove 'easily and' since 'incorrectly' is sufficient to justify the erratum.

John Boyer, Ph.D.
Senior Product Architect and Research Scientist
PureEdge Solutions Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jose Kahan [mailto:jose.kahan@w3.org]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 3:12 AM
To: Joseph Reagle
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Subject: Re: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML



Thanks Joseph,

I had some network problems on Friday, but I committed the errata
changes today[1]. I also fixed the typo on the exc-14n page[2].

I guess we're all set up for now.

http://www.w3.org/2001/03/C14N-errata
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/xml-exc-c14n-errata

-jose

On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:52:32PM -0500, Joseph Reagle wrote:
> On Thursday 20 November 2003 07:13, Jose Kahan wrote:
> > I processed all the errata except for the last one. I'm missing the one
> > related to the thread started at [1]. There is some text in the
> > thread, but I don't understand exactly what should be the text
> > of the errata. Thus, my followup up mail.
> >
> > Maybe I could bother you with another proposed text for it this
> > time ;)
> 
> How about (using John's text) this proposal, we could cast it as Editor or 
> Error I figure...:

[snip]
> 
> BTW: the errata of exc-14n, the first sentence of the errata has been 
> mangled: "The Exclusive Canonicalization Recommendation has been produced 
> by the IETF/W3C XML Signature Working.." +/Group/

Received on Monday, 24 November 2003 13:19:24 UTC