On Thursday 20 November 2003 07:13, Jose Kahan wrote: > I processed all the errata except for the last one. I'm missing the one > related to the thread started at [1]. There is some text in the > thread, but I don't understand exactly what should be the text > of the errata. Thus, my followup up mail. > > Maybe I could bother you with another proposed text for it this > time ;) How about (using John's text) this proposal, we could cast it as Editor or Error I figure...: E02 2003-11-20 (Editorial) Section 2.3 Processing Mode specifies the processing model for generating canonical output. The specification for the namespace node type reads, ". . . except assign the local name xmlns to the default namespace node if it exists . . ." This "assignment" can easily and incorrectly interprated as affecting the namespace/attribute ordering in section 2.2 Document Order. Consequently, the text should be corrected to read '. . . except write xmlns for the local name xmlns of the default namespace node if it exists . . .' BTW: the errata of exc-14n, the first sentence of the errata has been mangled: "The Exclusive Canonicalization Recommendation has been produced by the IETF/W3C XML Signature Working.." +/Group/ http://www.w3.org/2002/07/xml-exc-c14n-errataReceived on Thursday, 20 November 2003 12:52:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:18 GMT