Hi, John! Your explanation makes perfect sense and this is exactly how I understood the spec when I wrote the code. However, in both sections (sorry for 2.3 -> 3.2 confusion :) ) we are talking about "local name of the default namespace node" and this might confuse people. Thisis why I think that it would probably be a good idea to put your explanation in the eratra and clearly state that section 2.2 describes local name for default namespace node for sorting purposes and section 2.3 says how to render local name for default namespace node. Aleksey Sanin XML Security Library http://www.aleksey.com/xmlsecReceived on Wednesday, 1 October 2003 12:57:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:17 GMT