On Friday 06 December 2002 11:32 am, John Boyer wrote: > Yes, I agree too. The DTD says CDATA, but should the schema be > xsd:string, or should it be the longer and more precise content > specifier I posted yesterday? What is the motivation for the longer/precise defintion? My preference is not to create a new data type in the errata, but just rely upon string since that what schema and xslt seem to do for their "#foo" tokens.Received on Friday, 6 December 2002 12:09:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:16 GMT