W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: Exclusive C14N Error: Using #default in NMTOKENS

From: Gregor Karlinger <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 20:41:48 +0100
To: "'Joseph Reagle'" <reagle@w3.org>, "'John Boyer'" <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>
Cc: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006401c29ef1$ebc8d670$9fdcfea9@iktboard.local>
I basically would prefer to be as precise as the XML schema means

But in our context of trying to fix an erratum in an already existing
spec I tend to follow the way Joseph suggests and be as simple as
possible in the erratum text.

Liebe Gruesse/Regards,
Gregor Karlinger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Reagle
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 6:06 PM
> To: John Boyer; Gregor Karlinger
> Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Exclusive C14N Error: Using #default in NMTOKENS
> On Friday 06 December 2002 11:32 am, John Boyer wrote:
> > Yes, I agree too.  The DTD says CDATA, but should the schema be 
> > xsd:string, or should it be the longer and more precise content 
> > specifier I posted yesterday?
> What is the motivation for the longer/precise defintion? My 
> preference is 
> not to create a new data type in the errata, but just rely 
> upon string 
> since that what schema and xslt seem to do for their "#foo" tokens.

Received on Sunday, 8 December 2002 14:42:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:38 UTC