On Sunday 26 May 2002 08:31 am, Gregor Karlinger wrote: > A possible solution for this problem could be to explicitely > forbid an emtpy input for the XPath Filter 2.0 transform. Any > thought? How would one forbid this? We can't stop a user from specifying an XPath expression that misses the mark, right? If we said throw an error, that would stop the processing of the signature -- maybe there are other useful XPath transforms. We could add a processing step that says if the input node-set is empty the transform is done. -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 11:28:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:15 GMT