W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: [XPath Filter 2.0] Comments on current draft

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 11:22:53 -0400
To: "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@cio.gv.at>, "John Boyer" <jboyer@PureEdge.com>, "Merlin Hughs" <merlin@baltimore.ie>
Cc: "'XMLSigWG'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20020529152254.C0225859F5@aeon.w3.org>

On Sunday 26 May 2002 08:42 am, Gregor Karlinger wrote:
> (1) I think there a fuzzy use of the term "input document":
>     In the first sentence it identifies the underlying document
>     of the input node set (as defined in section 2, so I think
>     this is the correct use). In the second sentence it
>     identifies the input data of the transform; I suggest to
>     use the term "input" instead.

Changed to "The input required by this transform is an XPath input node-set 
over the input document." to abide by the definitions in section 2. 

> (2) The conversion form an octet stream to a XPath node-set
>     should be given more precise: I suggest to use the same
>     sentence as can be found in section of XMLDISG [2]:
>       "... MUST attempt to parse the octets yielding the
>        required node-set via [XML] well-formed processing."


new revision: 1.7;


Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 11:24:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:38 UTC