Thanks! I expected that both answers are 'yes' but decided to make sure :) Aleksey. Joseph Reagle wrote: >On Tuesday 14 May 2002 21:15, Aleksey Sanin wrote: > >>In the section 3.4 we compute the S' as follows: >> >> * Compute the set S' consisting of all nodes in the input document >> that are either present in S or that have an ancestor in S. This is >> equal to the union of all the document subtrees rooted by a node in >>S. >> >>Does this mean that >> 1) if the node N is in the nodes set S then S' contains all >>attributes for node N? (expected answer: "yes") >> > >I'd say yes, as the attributes "parent" element node is in S [1]. > >> 2) if the node N is in the nodes set S then S' contains all >>namespaces defined in the node N? (expected answer: "yes") >> > >Yes again [2]. > > >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xpath-19991116#attribute-nodes > " the element is the parent of each of these attribute nodes; however, an >attribute node is not a child of its parent element." >[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xpath-19991116#namespace-nodes >"The element is the parent of each of these namespace nodes; however, a >namespace node is not a child of its parent element." >Received on Monday, 20 May 2002 17:56:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:15 GMT