Re: Performace data and comparison

Christian,

Thanks a lot for the examples! On my Athlon 900MHz I have folllowing results
(everything compiled in debug mode w/o optimization):
    apachesample_xfilter2_doc_1.xml: Executed 100 tests in 110 msec
    apachesample_xfilter2_doc_2.xml: Executed 100 tests in 330 msec
    apachesample_xfilter2_doc_3.xml: Executed 100 tests in 300 msec
    apachesample_xfilter2_doc_4.xml: Executed 100 tests in 350 msec
    apachesample_xfilter2_doc_5.xml: Executed 100 tests in 430 msec
    apachesample_xfilter2_doc_6.xml: Executed 100 tests in 440 msec
    apachesample_xfilter2_doc_7.xml: Executed 100 tests in 500 msec
I did signature verification instead of document signing because there 
is no
difference for HMAC. As you can see, I also have linear performance drop
as it is expected (more transform operations more time it takes).


Aleksey.


Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote:

> --On Montag, 13. Mai 2002 14:43 -0700 Aleksey Sanin 
> <aleksey@aleksey.com> wrote:
>
>> Will you the signed documents for apachesample_xfilter2_* tests, please?
>> I am interesting in doing XML Sec library performance testsing but I am
>> not sure I want to check out and install Java sources to create these
>> examples.
>
>
> Hi Aleksey,
>
> attached.
>
> Same as the last example: HMAC with the six octets from "secret" as 
> 'passphrase'. doc is the 'signed' document, ref are the digested 
> contents.
>
> Regards,
> Christian