- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:14:01 -0400
- To: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
On Thursday 18 October 2001 12:50, Joseph Reagle wrote: > > Also, it would be nice if dates on W3C and IETF > > spec can be synched or at least have explicit statement the status > > section of the spec referring to both versions (W3C and IETF) so people > > will know that August 2001 W3C version is same as October 2001 IETF > > version. > > Already done in the WG pages and the specs. For example: However, I'll note that while we try to include the W3C Status (this is not boilerplate but informative) and URI of the corresponding document in the IETF drafts [1], we haven't been able to prevent the RFC editor from removing this information from the RFC [2]. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xmldsig-core-20001012/draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-10.txt [2] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3075.txt -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 13:14:03 UTC