W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-2-02.txt

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:14:01 -0400
To: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20011018171401.E23D287718@policy.w3.org>
On Thursday 18 October 2001 12:50, Joseph Reagle wrote:
> >  Also, it would be nice if dates on W3C and IETF
> > spec can be synched or at least have explicit statement the status
> > section of the spec referring to both versions (W3C and IETF) so people
> > will know that August 2001 W3C version is same as October 2001 IETF
> > version.
>
> Already done in the WG pages and the specs. For example:

However, I'll note that while we try to include the W3C Status (this is not 
boilerplate but informative) and URI of the corresponding document in the 
IETF drafts [1], we haven't been able to prevent the RFC editor from 
removing this information from the RFC [2].

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xmldsig-core-20001012/draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-10.txt
[2] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3075.txt

-- 
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 13:14:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:14 GMT