W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: Poll on Exclusive Canonicalization

From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <lde008@dma.isg.mot.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:14:07 -0400
Message-Id: <200106181414.KAA10776@noah.dma.isg.mot.com>
To: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, lde008@dma.isg.mot.com
Thanks,
Donald

From:  Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
Date:  Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:59:51 +0200
To:  "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>,
            "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>,
            Donald Eastlake <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Cc:  lde008@dma.isg.mot.com
Message-ID:  <713745709.992851191@clouseau>
In-Reply-To:  <4.3.2.7.2.20010614153157.00b5dac8@localhost>

>Dear Joseph,
>dear Donald,
>
>> 1. Specify the exclusive canonicalization as part of the non-normative
>> (nor required to implement) dsig-more specification [2]. 2.Specify the
>> exclusive canonicalization as part of the normative xmldsig-core  as
>> proposed in [3] (but with the URIs of [4]) as [REQUIRED, RECOMMENDED,
>> OPTIONAL]. (This option requires interoperable implementation of this
>> feature before xmldsig advances.)
>
>I vote for option 2 - Recommended.
>
>Specify the exclusive canonicalization as part of the normative 
>xmldsig-core  as proposed in [3] (but with the URIs of [4]) as RECOMMENDED.
>
>Thanks for the work,
>
>Christian
>
Received on Monday, 18 June 2001 10:14:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:13 GMT