> John Boyer wrote: [...] > The latter interpretation is consistent with how everyone actually > thinks of attributes. Actually, it's not. Stare at the HTML style attribute vs. the style element for a while, and I think you'll see why. If not, let me know and I'll try to find time to elaborate. It is simply a myth that unprefixed attribute names are bound to any namespace name. They are not. cf Myth #4: Unprefixed attribute names are in XML namespaces in Mar. 8, 2000: Namespace Myths Exploded by Ronald Bourret http://www.xml.com/pub/2000/03/08/namespaces/index.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Friday, 11 August 2000 13:24:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:10 GMT