- From: by way of <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 14:59:28 -0700
- To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
- Cc: jcowan@reutershealth.com
[reagle: i just noticed that this hadn't made it through the spam/cross-post filter] __ muraw3c@attglobal.net wrote: > Canonicalized documents do not contain XML declarations. > Is this OK? I believe c14n should preserve the version. > First, XML should allow some of the newly-introducedcharacters of > Unicode 3.0 as name characters. If we introduce them in V1.1 of XML, > validity (e.g., NMTOKEN) of an XML document will be dependent on the > XML version. Indeed, WFness may depend on it, if a new character appears in an attribute or element name. -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2000 14:58:49 UTC