W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

RE: Omission of the XML Version in C14N

From: John Boyer <jboyer@PureEdge.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 13:23:50 -0700
To: "John Cowan \(by way of \"Joseph M. Reagle Jr.\" <reagle@w3.org>\)" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BFEDKCINEPLBDLODCODKAEDMCEAA.jboyer@PureEdge.com>
Rather than my repeating it, please see [1]

[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000JulSep/0217.html


John Boyer
Development Team Leader,
Distributed Processing and XML
PureEdge Solutions Inc.
Creating Binding E-Commerce
v: 250-479-8334, ext. 143  f: 250-479-3772
1-888-517-2675   http://www.PureEdge.com <http://www.pureedge.com/>


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org
[mailto:w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of John Cowan (by way
of "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>)
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 2:59 PM
To: IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG
Cc: jcowan@reutershealth.com
Subject: Re: Omission of the XML Version in C14N


[reagle: i just noticed that this hadn't made it through the spam/cross-post
filter]
__

muraw3c@attglobal.net wrote:
> Canonicalized documents do not contain XML declarations.
> Is this OK?

I believe c14n should preserve the version.

> First, XML should allow some of the newly-introducedcharacters of
> Unicode 3.0 as name characters.  If we introduce them in V1.1 of XML,
> validity (e.g., NMTOKEN) of an XML document will be dependent on the
> XML version.

Indeed, WFness may depend on it, if a new character appears in an
attribute or element name.

--

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan
<jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2000 16:24:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:10 GMT