Re: <X509Name>CN=Kent</X509Name>

Hi Joseph,

> I wanted to point out that the examples you sent me (and Petteri confirmed)
> for the forthcoming Signature specification include an <X509Name> element
> that is not part of the schema. Do you mean X509SubjectName?

Yes, it should be X509SubjectName.  I modify our generation code.

> If you're able
> to send me a new example by the time it is published (sometime tomorrow)
> I'll include it, otherwise I'll note the mistake in the text.

You can modify it as it is valid.  The element is not used for
digest calculation.

-- 
TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM