W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: Clarify `UTF-8'

From: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:12:53 +0900
Message-Id: <200007100712.QAA27904@ns.trl.ibm.com>
To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
CC: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org

In message "Re: Clarify `UTF-8'"
    on 00/07/07, "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org> writes:
> I'm plodding through email in my inbox for the next version and unless you
> can provide a standard reference for UTF-8N we'll continue using the UTF-8
> reference in the context of the XML specification that Boyer pointed out.

I asked some Unicode people about standardization of UTF-8N.
But anyone did not know about it.  We should use the name
'UTF-8' in the specification but I hope adding short note about
no-BOM to the specification.

TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM
Received on Monday, 10 July 2000 03:13:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:34 UTC