Kent, I'm plodding through email in my inbox for the next version and unless you can provide a standard reference for UTF-8N we'll continue using the UTF-8 reference in the context of the XML specification that Boyer pointed out. At 09:51 6/20/00 +0900, TAMURA Kent wrote: >XML Signature spec. and Canonical XML spec. refer 'UTF-8' many >times. Please clarify which is each UTF-8, 'UTF-8' (with UTF-8 >signature, EF BB BF) or 'UTF-8N' (without UTF-8 siganture). > >See Table 2 in http://www-4.ibm.com/software/developer/library/utfencodingforms/index.html > >-- >TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM > _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/Received on Friday, 7 July 2000 22:03:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:10 GMT