W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: Clarify `UTF-8'

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 22:02:35 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org

I'm plodding through email in my inbox for the next version and unless you
can provide a standard reference for UTF-8N we'll continue using the UTF-8
reference in the context of the XML specification that Boyer pointed out.

At 09:51 6/20/00 +0900, TAMURA Kent wrote:
 >XML Signature spec. and Canonical XML spec. refer 'UTF-8' many
 >times.  Please clarify which is each UTF-8, 'UTF-8' (with UTF-8
 >signature, EF BB BF) or 'UTF-8N' (without UTF-8 siganture).
 >See Table 2 in
 >TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM

Joseph Reagle Jr.   
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Friday, 7 July 2000 22:03:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:34 UTC