W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2000

RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures

From: Gregor Karlinger <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:37:09 +0100
To: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, "John Boyer" <jboyer@PureEdge.com>
Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, <w3c-xsl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBIMACDKCOPBLEJCCDKEBACEAA.gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
> >... or simply add another transform afterwards which is doing
> >XML canonicalization as recommended by the current XML-Signature
> >draft to avoid such problems.
> 
> This only complicates things, because you have to pass
> some parameters around.

Why? Which parameters? A concluding canonicalization transform 
should be considered anyway if SAX/DOM parsers are employed by
an implementation.

Gregor
---------------------------------------------------------------
Gregor Karlinger
mailto://gregor.karlinger@iaik.at
http://www.iaik.at
Phone +43 316 873 5541
Institute for Applied Information Processing and Communications
Austria
---------------------------------------------------------------
 
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2000 04:38:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:09 GMT