RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures

At 00/03/22 10:11 +0100, Gregor Karlinger wrote:
> > I guess the only thing that makes sense here is to define
> > that the XPath serializer produce output in a single specific
> > encoding. I guess that would most probably be UTF-8.
>
>... or simply add another transform afterwards which is doing
>XML canonicalization as recommended by the current XML-Signature
>draft to avoid such problems.

This only complicates things, because you have to pass
some parameters around.

Regards,   Martin.