W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: Comments on last call draft

From: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 11:15:41 +0900
Message-Id: <200003160215.LAA20380@ns.trl.ibm.com>
To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>

> If we follow your advice to the end, it means that we cannot sign XML at
> all, in whole or in part, because we cannot count on attribute order going
> from tool to tool, which will break signatures signatures unless full c14n
> is required or, at the very least, lex order XPath serialization.

It is right.  We must canonicalize XML resources for
interoperability before we compare XML resources.  This is
essential nature of XML.

-- 
TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2000 21:16:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:09 GMT