W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: Signature definitions

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 14:38:55 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000111143855.00a12740@localhost>
To: Gregor.Karlinger@iaik.at
Cc: John Boyer <jboyer@uwi.com>, DSig Group <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 12:03 00/01/11 +0100, Gregor Karlinger wrote:
 >As an alternative approach, consider to label the types which a data entity
 >to be signed could have, in relation to its signature:

Gregor, thanks for the comment. I sort of tried this approach when I
realized the qualifier was sometimes referring to the signature, and
sometimes to the data.  However, it ended up leading to rather awkward
grammatical constructs in the sentences of the spec.

_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.   
Policy Analyst           mailto:reagle@w3.org
XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2000 14:41:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:08 GMT