W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2000

RE: Questions/Comments for the current draft.

From: Gregor Karlinger <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 08:51:25 +0200
To: "Yoshiaki KAWATSURA" <kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>, "Brian LaMacchia" <bal@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <NDBBIMACDKCOPBLEJCCDMEHNCGAA.gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
Hi Yoshiaki!

> (2-1) For X509Data
> I think the X509IssuerName in the example of X509Data should be
> described actual value such that distinguished name, for example
> <X509IssuerName>CN =XXX Cert, C= US, O = XXX Trust Inc.</X509IssuerName>.
> # Is there any general guideline which describes about text representation
> # of distinguished name? I found <draft-ietf-pkix-generalname-00.txt>
> # which specifies text representations for distinguished names
> # but this document has already expired.

A previous version of the XML-Signature draft mentioned RFC 2253 as the way
to represent a Name as a text string, I think this is still intended by
the authors

(Joseph, Brian: Am I right here?)

Regards, Gregor
Gregor Karlinger
Phone +43 316 873 5541
Institute for Applied Information Processing and Communications
Received on Monday, 26 June 2000 02:53:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:33 UTC