W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2000

Fwd: Acknowledged Submission: XML Japanese Profile

From: Martin J. Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 12:03:15 +0900
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20000417115459.0362d8f0@sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>
To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Dear XML Dsig WG,

The W3C has received a submission that we think is relevant for
digital signatures. As mentioned in the W3C staff comment, I'm
herewith bringing this submission to the attention of this WG.

As pointed out, bringing this submission to the attention of
the WG does not imply any particular commitment from W3C
or from the WG. However, I think the submission can serve as
a very clear and detailled documentation of the kind of problems
that can appear when converting from legacy encodings to Unicode/
ISO 10646. These problems are rather minor when it's just a
question of looking at a page, but in the context of digital
signatures, they can be quite serious. Pointing to the submission
as an example when discussing such conversion problems as requested
in the I18N WG/IG last call comments may be a good idea.

Regards,   Martin.



>Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:24:05 -0400
>From: Janet Daly <janet@w3.org>
>Organization: World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

>Dear Advisory Committee Representative,
>
>This message is to inform you of the Director's
>Acknowledgment of the following Submission Request:
>
>         XML Japanese Profile
>         Fuji Xerox Information Systems, Panasonic,
>         Toshiba, GLOCOM, Academica Sinica, Alis Technologies
>
>The complete Submission Request and submitted materials are
>publicly available at:
>
>         http://www.w3.org/Submission/2000/03/
>
>The W3C Team Comment is at:
>
>         http://www.w3.org/Submission/2000/03/Comment.html
>
>      Excerpted Abstract
>
>          XML Japanese Profile addresses the issues of using
>         Japanese characters in XML documents. In particular,
>      ambiguities in converting existing Japanese charsets
>      to Unicode are clearly pointed out.
>
>The W3C Contact for this Submission is Martin Duerst
>(duerst@w3.org).
>
>Section 5.3 (Acknowledgment of a Submission request -
>http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/#SubmissionYes) of the
>W3C
>Process Document explains the significance of the Director's
>acknowledgment:
>
>      The acknowledgment of a Submission request does
>      not imply that any action will be taken by W3C. It does
>      not imply an endorsement by W3C, the W3C Team, or
>      any of the Members of W3C. It merely records publicly
>      that the Submission request has been made by the
>      submitting Member. The specification may not be
>      referred to as "work in process" of the W3C.
>
>A listing of all acknowledged Submissions can be found at:
>
>         http://www.w3.org/Submission/
>
>for Tim Berners-Lee;
>Janet Daly, Head of Communications
>
>=====================================
Received on Sunday, 16 April 2000 22:59:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:09 GMT