Sure sounds reasonable to me. Donald From: "Jim Schaad (Exchange)" <jimsch@EXCHANGE.MICROSOFT.com> Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 18:22:52 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Message-Id: <199910192222.SAA15588@www19.w3.org> Message-ID: <EAB5B8B61A04684198FF1D0C1B3ACD194A709F@DINO> To: "W3c-Ietf-Xmldsig (E-mail)" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 15:22:12 -0700 >Given the text in section 4.3.3 about transformations only be applied if >they are listed, and the text in section 1.3.3 "If no Transformations >element is present, the data pointed at by Location is digested directly". >I believe that we can remove the NULL canonicalization algorithm from the >document. The algorithm basically states that you do no changes on the >input before hashing it. This is the same thing as the text in section >1.3.3 says. >Note: It might be wise to copy this comment to section 4.3.3 as well for >people to easily see it during implemenation. >Recommend: Remove NULL Canonicalization algorithm from the document in all >locations. >jim schaadReceived on Tuesday, 19 October 1999 22:51:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:08 GMT