One area of the spec I'd like to see discussion of is algorithm parameters. Currently only the HMAC algorithm takes a parameter; section 7.3.1 of the latest draft [1] shows the example: <SignatureAlg Algorithm="urn:ietf-org:hmac-sha1"> <Parameter type="urn:ietf-org:hmac-outputlength"> <Integer value="128"/> </Parameter> </SignatureAlg> I'm not sure I wouldn't prefer <SignatureAlg Algorithm="urn:ietf-org:hmac-sha1"> <Parameter type="urn:ietf-org:hmac-outputlength">128</Parameter> </SignatureAlg> or even <SignatureAlg Algorithm="urn:ietf-org:hmac-sha1"> <HmacOutputLength">128</HmacOutputLength> </SignatureAlg> with the HmacOutputLength element defined in the dsig namespace. The last one is probably a non-starter (new element types for every algorithm?)... Clearly I'm on the fence here... thoughts? -Mark Bartel JetForm [1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/WD-xmldsig-core-991008.htmlReceived on Friday, 8 October 1999 14:33:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:08 GMT