W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: Comments on core-991001

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 13:57:27 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, "Barbara Fox" <bfox@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
Cc: "W3c-Ietf-Xmldsig (E-mail)" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 09:07 99/10/06 -0400, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote:
 >Participants in this working group are reminded that 'Working group
 >members must disclose intellectual properties "that are reasonably and
 >personally known" to be relevant to this WG in accordance with IETF
 >and W3C procedure; including notice and disclosure of such information
 >to the WG, and the IETF Executive Director.' (from the IETF XMLDSIG

To this end, I've added a patent disclosure page [1] (which I've been
meaning to do).


[1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Disclosures.html

   The following disclosures have been made by members of the WG as
   [5]requested by the Chairs and required by [6]IETF and [7]W3C
   procedure. Copyright issues are covered by the [8]WG Contributor
   [9]Scott McLeod. FactPoint: [10]Disclosure of IPR that "might" be
          relevant  ([11]Subsequent clarification.)
          "... We have intellectual property rights which may be related
          to the signing of HTML and XML documents...."
   [12]Chris Smithies. PenOp: [13]PenOp IPR disclosure.
          "... To the best of my knowledge, my organization owns many
          intellectual property claims regarding the signing of
          electronic data, including XML documents..."

Joseph Reagle Jr.   
Policy Analyst           mailto:reagle@w3.org
XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 1999 13:57:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:32 UTC