progress on WebDAV BIND, was: I-D Action:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-26.txt

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the draft below contains the example for locking behavior in presence of 
> multiple bindings, as proposed a few days ago.
> 
> At this point I'd like to ask those who still have concerns with the 
> specification to verify that the example given matches the locking 
> semantics in RFC 4918.
> 
> If it does not, we'll need to do more work. If if does, then it appears 
> that Appendix A is indeed a clarification of RFC 4918, nothing more.
> 
> BR, Julian
> ...

In the meantime I had a conversation with our AD, trying to identify 
what's left to do. We identified three issues:

1) copying-complex-loops 
(<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-issues.html#issue.copying-complex-loops>)

2) bind-vs-hierarchy 
(<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-issues.html#issue.bind-vs-hierarchy>)

3) locking2 
(<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-issues.html#issue.locking2>)

I'll address the individual issues in separate mails.

Best regards, Julian