- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:13:55 +0100
- To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- CC: Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com>, Atom-syntax Syntax' <atom-syntax@imc.org>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > > Putting something under version control really doesn't mean anything > beyond having multiple versions of the resource. > There are of course a variety of other features supported by many > versioning servers, but having a version history is the lowest common > denominator. > > So yes, this draft would apply to the case you describe, as long as > multiple separately addressable versions of the resource are provided. > > Cheers, > Geoff > ... Agreed. At least for the link relations that support the navigation between versions it really doesn't matter whether internally a version control system was used. (For the working-copy related relations things may be different because they somehow imply authorability of a resource). Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 11 December 2009 11:14:46 UTC