Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > > Putting something under version control really doesn't mean anything > beyond having multiple versions of the resource. > There are of course a variety of other features supported by many > versioning servers, but having a version history is the lowest common > denominator. > > So yes, this draft would apply to the case you describe, as long as > multiple separately addressable versions of the resource are provided. > > Cheers, > Geoff > ... Agreed. At least for the link relations that support the navigation between versions it really doesn't matter whether internally a version control system was used. (For the working-copy related relations things may be different because they somehow imply authorability of a resource). Best regards, JulianReceived on Friday, 11 December 2009 11:14:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 11 December 2009 11:14:47 GMT