W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: [VCARDDAV] IANA Considerations, was: vcarddav WGLC on draft-ietf-vcarddav-{carddav, mkcol}

From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:10:07 -0400
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, vcarddav@ietf.org, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E0B43D80987FE4C8671C2906@socrates.local>
Hi Julian,

--On March 12, 2009 3:46:07 PM +0100 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 
wrote:

> A few comments with respect to the IANA Considerations
> (<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav-06#section-14>):
>
> 1) The references style, as in
>
>    "... defined by RFC4918 [RFC4918] for ..."
>
> looks a bit weird (artifact from a time when this document used numeric
> references?)

Agreed - fixed.

> 2) The statement:
>
>     "All other IANA considerations mentioned in RFC4918 [RFC4918] also
>     apply to this document."
>
> is very misleading; RFC 4918's IANA Considerations talk about URI scheme
> registrations, HTTP header registrations, and HTTP status code
> registrations. None of this is relevant to CardDAV, so just drop the
> sentence.

Yup that was a little odd. I have changed the section to simply:

    This document uses a URN to describe a new XML namespace conforming to
    the registry mechanism described in [RFC3688].

> 3) I also found the statement below confusing:
>
>    "XML: None.  Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification."
>
> Proposal: just state:
>
>    "XML: None - not applicable for namespace registrations".

Changed.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo
Received on Monday, 16 March 2009 02:10:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:16 GMT