Julian Reschke wrote: > > Julian Reschke wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have updated my "POST in WebDAV proposal". >> >> At this point I think it's ready for an informal last call. From my >> point of view the remaining questions are: >> >> - is there sufficient community support for this justifying the put >> the element names into the DAV: namespace? > > I heard two "yes" votes (one on which from one of our Area Directory), > an no "no". > > So the next draft will use the DAV: namespace. > >> and >> >> - should I keep the sections that talk about the HTTP Link header >> (which is currently being proposed in an I-D which may or may not be >> ready before this proposal is ready) > > For now I'll leave this out; instead, when the Link header spec is done > I'll propose a document specifying how to map link-typed DAV properties > to Link headers in general (see proposal in > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2008OctDec/0026.html>). > > BR, Julian So I made the two changes announced above, and submitted it as draft-reschke-webdav-post-03. At this point I think this is stable, and therefore would like to give the WebDAV community four weeks for review (*), until I'll ask Lisa Dusseault to process this as an individual submission. BR, Julian (*) because of the holidaysReceived on Monday, 8 December 2008 12:34:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:16 GMT