Julian Reschke wrote: > > Hi, > > I have updated my "POST in WebDAV proposal". > > At this point I think it's ready for an informal last call. From my > point of view the remaining questions are: > > - is there sufficient community support for this justifying the put the > element names into the DAV: namespace? I heard two "yes" votes (one on which from one of our Area Directory), an no "no". So the next draft will use the DAV: namespace. > and > > - should I keep the sections that talk about the HTTP Link header (which > is currently being proposed in an I-D which may or may not be ready > before this proposal is ready) For now I'll leave this out; instead, when the Link header spec is done I'll propose a document specifying how to map link-typed DAV properties to Link headers in general (see proposal in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2008OctDec/0026.html>). BR, JulianReceived on Saturday, 6 December 2008 21:28:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:37 UTC