John Barone wrote: > The Xythos server currently doesn't implement the limit feature. The > server does truncate results based on a server setting. Making sure the > truncated results are globally ordered is difficult, for the reasons you > outlined and particularly when the search spans multiple data stores. ...another good point I forgot. > Implementing the limit feature would pose the same ordering challenges. > I think making 5.17.1 a MUST places a heavy burden on the server > implementation. One alternative would be "SHOULD", another one would be just stating that DAV:limit is optional, and servers that can't do the MUST level requirement should reject the query. Any preference? BR, JulianReceived on Monday, 4 August 2008 17:40:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:16 GMT