On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 06:05:55PM +0100, Julian Reschke wrote: > WebDAV is as fast as FTP, usually being only limited by bandwidth and > latency of the link. And of course there are lots of other reasons to > like WebDAV, such as that it *is* HTTP -- no new URI needed to edit > something that already is on the web. DAV is typically (really, always) *faster* than FTP, since it doesn't require the set up of a new TCP connection for each data transfer. Understanding the impact of separate DTP/control sockets answers the "Why not just improve FTP?" question for most people, I'd suspect. joeReceived on Thursday, 1 November 2007 01:52:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 November 2007 01:52:54 GMT