Geoffrey M Clemm schrieb: > > I don't think so. Suppose that /a/b identified a resource R1. Also > suppose that /c identified resource R1. > > If you rebind /a to /a/b, that will delete the binding named "b" to R1 > in the collection named by "/a", so /c will still identify R1, not the > folder that was identified by "/a", so there is no reason for /c/a to > identify the collection (unless /c/a originally identified the > collection, in which case it falls under the criteria of my message > below, i.e. that there was another binding to /a). > > Cheers, > Geoff Ah. Seems I misread the question then.Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2006 17:12:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:27 GMT