- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 20:58:48 +0100
- To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- CC: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > > I don't see an alternative. The only thing I'd suggest is to > slightly simplify the qualifier by not referring to the If header > (since we can state in the definition of If header that it > doesn't recurse via Depth), i.e.: > > "Any headers on a method that has a defined interaction with the Depth > header MUST be applied to all resources in the scope of the method > except where alternative behavior is explicitly defined, and except for > the If-* headers defined in RFC2616." The reason I mentioned "If" as well is because people may still assume that a If header in tagged list form is going to be applied to all resources in scope, thus I preferred to be safe. If I'm the only one seeing that as a potential for confusion we can of course remove that statement. Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 7 January 2006 20:01:07 UTC