Sounds good, I'm not seeing any objection to this plan so let me know when you have it ready. On 8/21/05 10:28 PM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Cullen Jennings wrote: >> ... >> I'd like to get the WG feedback about moving this forward as "Experimental". >> Note that this would not stop this approach from becoming standards track it >> it became clear over time that it was the approach that the community wanted >> to recommend for solving this problem. > > I think that would be the right approach. However, before proceeding, > I'd like to fix the Depth header vs Apply-To-Redirect-Ref issue that > Jake B. reported (trying to get this done this week). > > Best regards, JulianReceived on Monday, 26 September 2005 17:24:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:23 GMT