Re: Support for non-DAV collections

Helge Hess wrote:
> Can't tell about the interop requirements, but removing superflous  
> things is always a good thing.

Funny enough, that's something I violently agree with :-) On the other 
hand, when going from Proposed to Draft, another good rule is not to 
change things that aren't broken.

But if we all agree that we *do* want to remove paragraphs that are 
superfluous (because they neither define anything specific, nor are 
needed as explanations), that's fine with me. Let's just be consistent 
in that.

Best regards, Julian