I think it is also not clear if its a hop-to-hop or end-to-end header. So chances of getting it working in an uncontrolled environment are not good. //Stefan Am 17.02.2005 um 22:28 schrieb Julian Reschke: > > Helge Hess wrote: >> On 17. Feb 2005, at 22:04 Uhr, Jim Whitehead wrote: >>> 1) One problem clients currently encounter with PUT is determining >>> whether >>> they have permission to write to a specific location. At present, a >>> client >>> must submit a PUT (or ADDMEMBER) with the entire entity body, then >>> wait for >>> the response, or the authentication challenge. >> Isn't that already solved with Expect: 100-continue? >> http://zvon.org/tmRFC/RFC2616/Output/chapter14.html#sub20 > > Sort of. The problem is that it's extremely hard to implement using > the Java servlet API (but that's "just" an implementation issue...). > > Best regards, Julian > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 >Received on Friday, 18 February 2005 08:26:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:22 GMT