W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: Comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt, Was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-05.txt

From: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:37:17 -0800
Message-Id: <9BD9E20C-7BE6-11D9-84E6-000A95AACED2@xythos.com>
Cc: WebDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On Feb 10, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Brian Korver wrote:
>> ...
>>> 04-C11, section 7
>>>
>>>      "The total size of a collection, DAV:quota-used-bytes, is not
>>>       necessarily a sum of the DAV:getcontentlength properties for
>>>       resources stored in the collection."
>>>
>>> Actually, it won't be in most cases I'm aware of. Please either  
>>> rephrase it (so this doesn't sound like an edge case) or drop the  
>>> point.
>> Fixed in -05
>
> It's now saying
>
> "The total size of a collection, DAV:quota-used-bytes, may not be a 
> sum of the DAV:getcontentlength properties for resources stored in the 
> collection."
>
> ...which isn't that different...

Ok, then what wording would you suggest?



>
>
>> ...
>>> 05-E02, section 5
>>>
>>> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-quota 
>>> -05.html#rfc.section.5>
>>>
>>> The artwork in the request is too wide for RFC publication and 
>>> should  be re-indented (the response isn't too wide but should be 
>>> re-indented  for consistency nevertheless).
>>>
>> Fixed in -06.  If it's still not to your liking, let me know how
>> and I'll change it.
>
> Seems to be fine now.
>
> > ...
>
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>
-brian
briank@xythos.com
Received on Friday, 11 February 2005 04:37:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT