W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: Status of working group last call on BIND

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:33:26 +0100
Message-ID: <420BD326.4090805@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: Joe Hildebrand <jhildebrand@jabber.com>, webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Thanks Joe,
> 
> from my p.o.v.:
> 
> #2) Should be closed: consensus for the change made with 
> <http://www.webdav.org/bind/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-latest.html#rfc.issue.2.7_unlock_vs_bindings> 
> 
> 
> #5) Should be closed: has 0 votes on it
> 
> #71) Should be closed: has only 1 vote on it from Elias, and he's 
> satisfied with the explanations and changes made 
> (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2005JanMar/0163.html>).
> 
> #71b) The question raised by you, Joe, in 
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2005JanMar/0165.html> 
> is IMHO a distinct issue, it's being tracked with 
> <http://www.webdav.org/bind/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-latest.html#rfc.issue.9_ns_op_and_acl>, 
> you may want to open a new BugZilla issue if you feel that there's a 
> risk that we're not following up properly.
> 
> 
> Regarding the three issues raised post-last-call: please give guidance 
> on how to proceed. So far, there aren't any votes on them, and it 
> doesn't seem any new feedback is coming in. I think we still should plan 
> to submit a document for publication in time before the IETF, which is 
> roughly two weeks from now.

I note that no further discussion has taken place since the issues were 
entered (and replied to). There are also no votes on them so far.

Unless there's any new discussion on these topics, I'll submit the 
current spec before the end of the next week and ask the WG chairs to 
submit it to the IESG for last call.

Best regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:34:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT