W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: BIND and access control lists

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 18:25:02 +0100
Message-ID: <42025E6E.7020908@gmx.de>
To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
CC: webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:
> 
> The statement that would be consistent with 3744 would be
> "BIND is the same as MOVE with respect to the DAV:acl property".  

...same for REBIND...

> (I prefer to state it that way, rather than copying the
> paragraphs from 3744, since that allows us to modify
> DAV:acl behavior in 3744bis without having to revise the
> binding specification).

+1

> If nobody objects to that behavior, then I am happy to add
> that sentence to the BIND specification.

So where should that statement go (or these statements when we include 
UNBIND)? Should we insert a new top-level paragraph stating the behaviour?

> If anyone objects to that behavior, then that is an issue
> against 3744, and then I believe the BIND specification
> should remain silent on the topic, and the issue should be raised
> against 3744 for resolution.

+1

Best regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2005 17:25:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT