W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2005

[Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks.

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:35:08 -0800
Message-Id: <200501190735.j0J7Z8p8005929@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2





------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de  2005-01-18 23:35 -------
Suggested additional text bei Joe Hildebrand, Chuck Fay and Julian Reschke:

2.x UNLOCK and Bindings

Due to the specific language used in section 8.11 of [RFC2518], it might
be thought that an UNLOCK request to a locked resource would unlock just
the particular binding expressed by the Request-URI, rather than the
resource identified by that URI.  This is not the case, however.
Section 6 of [RFC2518] clearly states that locks are on resources, not
URIs, so the server MUST allow UNLOCK to be used to unlock a locked
resource through any binding to that resource.  The authors of this
specification anticipate and recommend that future revisions of
[RFC2518] maintain this behavior.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 07:35:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT