W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2004

[Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks.

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:43:34 -0800
Message-Id: <200412030043.iB30hYbU002334@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2

lisa@osafoundation.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WORKSFORME                  |



------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org  2004-12-02 16:43 -------
I don't consider this issue closed.  We can't expect spec readers to deduce the
questions based on reading several specs and intuiting all the details of the
models that the spec writers had. I agree it's too bad RFC2518bis isn't done but
even if it were there would still be work to be done in bindings to say what
lockdiscovery looks like, and how UNLOCK must work.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Friday, 3 December 2004 00:43:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:51 UTC