Jim Whitehead wrote: > >>So, could you please specify exactly which situation you'd >>like the example to be for? My understanding was: >> >>- Method: REBIND >>- Locks on: source and target collection >> >>Correct? > > > I'd like the example to be the following. > > Given the following collection hierarchy, the example should cover a REBIND > of C3:(CollZ->C1) to C3:(CollZ->C2). > > +------------------+ > | Root Collection | > | bindings: | > | CollW | > +------------------+ > | > | > | > +-------------------------------+ > | Collection C1 |<--------+ > | bindings: | | > | CollX CollY | | > +-------------------------------+ | > | | | > | | (creates loop) | > | | | > +-----------------+ +------------------+ | > | Collection C2 | | Collection C3 | | > | LOCKED infinity | | LOCKED infinity | | > | bindings: | | bindings: | | > | {none} | | y.gif CollZ | | > +-----------------+ +------------------+ | > | | | > | +------+ > | > +---------------------------+ > | Resource R2 | > | (lock inhereited from C3) | > +---------------------------+ > > Note that it's fine with me if we don't discuss exactly how the lock state > in the example came to be -- just take it as a given, and go from there. Wow. Just to make sure, we're talking about MOVE /CollW/CollY/CollZ HTTP/1.1 Destination: /CollW/CollX Overwrite: T ? Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Thursday, 2 December 2004 21:03:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT